Newsletter of Phenomenology

Keeping phenomenologists informed since May 2002

Repository | Book | Chapter

191186

W. v. Quine and N. Goodman

Guido Küng

pp. 127-160

For Quine and Goodman the distinction between names that name something and so-called syncategorematic signs, is of special importance. In order to answer the question "How and what do predicate signs represent?" in their sense, we must first know whether predicate signs are genuine names or merely syncategorematic words. As we shall see, Quine has found a criterion that indicates precisely which words the user of a frege-russellian language regards as genuine names: they are those words in respect of which quantification is permitted; i.e., those that name an object in the value-range of the variables.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-3514-9_10

Full citation:

Küng, G. (1967). W. v. Quine and N. Goodman, in Ontology and the logistic analysis of language, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 127-160.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.