Newsletter of Phenomenology

Keeping phenomenologists informed since May 2002

Repository | Book | Chapter

225312

(2015) Philosophy of leadership, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.

Political leadership

contractual authority

Robert Spillane, Jean-Etienne Joullié

pp. 109-134

In the fifteenth century, people in what we know as Italy were living in an era dominated by competing schools of thought — Christian Humanism, Christian Stoicism, even Christian Scepticism. Into this cauldron of incompatible ideas, the ideas of pagan writers were mixed. The mood of the times was empirical and sceptical and scientists and philosophers like Leonardo da Vinci and Machiavelli were impatient with abstract rules of method: they were interested in the collection of facts and inductive generalisations from them. They were concerned with what is the case rather than what should be the case and it is for this reason that Francis Bacon acknowledged Machiavelli as a political scientist. Rather than compare and contrast political theories, Machiavelli formulated generalisations about political power from his reading of the pagan classics and his experience of current political affairs.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1057/9781137499202_6

Full citation:

Spillane, R. , Joullié, J. (2015). Political leadership: contractual authority, in Philosophy of leadership, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 109-134.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.