Newsletter of Phenomenology

Keeping phenomenologists informed since May 2002


(2016) Husserl Studies 32 (1).

Phenomenology as critique

teleological–historical reflection and Husserl's transcendental eidetics

Andreea Smaranda Aldea

pp. 21-46

Many have deemed ineluctable the tension between Husserl's transcendental eidetics and his Crisis method of historical reflection. In this paper, I argue that this tension is an apparent one. I contend that dissolving this tension and showing not only the possibility, but also the necessity of the successful collaboration between these two apparently irreconcilable methods guarantees the very freedom of inquiry Husserl so emphatically stressed. To make this case, I draw from Husserl's synthetic analyses of type and concept constitution as well as his later work on sedimentation and streaming-in and develop a richer modal taxonomy than the one Husserl proposed. I employ this taxonomy in an examination of the structures and conditions for the possibility of transcendental eidetic variation in order to show this method's reliance on historically sedimented epistemic and normative resources. This reliance brings to light the necessity for a methodological critique, which is precisely what I take to be the work of teleological–historical reflection as Husserl comes to conceive it in the Crisis.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/s10743-016-9186-8

Full citation:

Aldea, (2016). Phenomenology as critique: teleological–historical reflection and Husserl's transcendental eidetics. Husserl Studies 32 (1), pp. 21-46.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.