Newsletter of Phenomenology

Keeping phenomenologists informed since May 2002

145657

(2005) Human Studies 28 (4).

The atomistic self versus the holistic self in structural relation to the other

Simon Glynn

pp. 363-374

I argue that meaning or significanceper se, along with the capacity to be conscious thereof, and the values, motives and aspirations, etc. central to the constitution of our intrinsic personal identities, arise, as indeed do our extrinsic social identities, and our very self-consciousness as such, from socio-cultural structures and relations to others. However, so far from our identities and behavior therefore being determined, I argue that the capacity for critical reflection and evaluation emerge from these same structural relations, the more complex and quintessentially human aspects of our behavior being explained not in terms of responses to stimuli but as choices reflecting our evaluation of meaningful or significant alternatives. Finally I provide theoretical grounds for accepting the existence of other subjects and give a holistic, as opposed to a dialectical, account of the way individuals may challenge and change the very socio-cultural ways of relating to and interacting with others so central to constituting their capacities and identities.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/s10746-005-9001-6

Full citation:

Glynn, S. (2005). The atomistic self versus the holistic self in structural relation to the other. Human Studies 28 (4), pp. 363-374.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.