Newsletter of Phenomenology

Keeping phenomenologists informed since May 2002

146040

(1995) Human Studies 18 (1).

Signifying harassment

communication, ambiguity and power

Andrew R. Smith , Jacqueline Martinez

pp. 63-87

This essay reports on phenomenological research conducted with people who describe having been harassed, having been accused of harassment, and/or having mediated or adjudicated harassment disputes. The authors review recent legal conceptions of sexual harassment and articulate a methodology for analyzing individual narrative accounts. The analysis of six selected interviews (three alleged harassers and three declared harassees) depicts how, through discourse with others, persons in ambiguous cases of harassment come to perceive themselves as harassers or harasseesgradually, how intention is inferred from conductcontingently, and how perceptions and expressions are often reified as certainties in the effort to secure some sense of justiceinstitutionally.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/BF01322840

Full citation:

Smith, A. R. , Martinez, J. (1995). Signifying harassment: communication, ambiguity and power. Human Studies 18 (1), pp. 63-87.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.