Repository | Journal | Volume | Articles
(1989) Synthese 81 (3).
Bootstrapping while barefoot (crime models vs. theoretical models in the hunt for serial killers)
Jon Nordby
pp. 373-389
Investigating random homicides involves constructing models of an odd sort. While the differences between these models and scientific models are radical, calling them models is justified both by functional and structural similarities. Serial homicide investigations illustrate the marked difference between theoretical models in science and the models applied in these criminal investigations. This is further illustrated by considering Glymourian bootstrapping in attempts to solve such homicides. The solutions that result differ radically from explanations in science that are confirmed or disconfirmed by occurrences. Unlike the scientist, the flatfoot gumshoe is also barefoot: he is bereft of a general, determinative theoretical frame. This result shows that criminal investigations do not apply ‘science’ in the Galilean sense.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/BF00869322
Full citation:
Nordby, J. (1989). Bootstrapping while barefoot (crime models vs. theoretical models in the hunt for serial killers). Synthese 81 (3), pp. 373-389.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.
Warning: mysqli_connect(): (HY000/2002): Cannot assign requested address in /home/clients/b010bcc84441ff7c5adbaf4e922effaa/web/ocoph/UtilSite/GenDBconnect.php on line 15
Cannot connect to DataBase