Newsletter of Phenomenology

Keeping phenomenologists informed since May 2002

Repository | Book | Chapter

Rationality and controversy

reading Darwin through Dascalian eyes

pp. 29-37

Marcelo Dascal has made a major contribution to the study of rationality and argumentation. In the present text, I explore the impact of his approach on the analysis of Charles Darwin's "one long argument', as Darwin calls his theory of the origin of species. Dascal's typology and analyses of polemic interactions – in particular, his analyses of controversies and their role in scientific argumentation – provide a strong tool for the understanding of the structure and performance of Darwinian argumentation. The backbone of Darwin's theory lies in comparison between opposing positions. Furthermore, Dascal's approach allows one to see the philosophical possibilities and implications of Darwin's naturalistic view of "rationality', on the basis of Dascal's distinctions and relations between "hard' and "soft' rationality. On the one hand, Darwin's explanatory efforts fit into the domain of the latter one, typical of polemic debates. On the other hand, the reading of Darwin can show how Dascal's approach to rationality can be earthly embedded.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7131-4_3

Full citation:

(2014)., Rationality and controversy: reading Darwin through Dascalian eyes, in D. Riesenfeld & G. Scarafile (eds.), Perspectives on theory of controversies and the ethics of communication, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 29-37.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.