Newsletter of Phenomenology

Keeping phenomenologists informed since May 2002

Killing the straw man

Dennett and phenomenology

Dan Zahavi

pp. 21-43

Can phenomenology contribute to the burgeoning science of consciousness? Dennett’s reply would probably be that it very much depends upon the type of phenomenology in question. In my paper I discuss the relation between Dennett’s heterophenomenology and the type of classical philosophical phenomenology that one can find in Husserl, Scheler and Merleau-Ponty. I will in particular be looking at Dennett’s criticism of classical phenomenology. How vulnerable is it to Dennett’s criticism, and how much of a challenge does his own alternative constitute? I will argue that there are some rather marked differences between these two approaches to consciousness, but as I also hope to make clear, Dennett’s own account of where the differences are located is off target and ultimately based on a somewhat flawed conception of what classical phenomenology amounts to.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/s11097-006-9038-7

Full citation:

Zahavi, D. (2007). Killing the straw man: Dennett and phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (1-2), pp. 21-43.

References

Other minds

2001

Anita Avramides

New York, Oxford University Press

Phenomenology: straight and hetero

2003

David Cerbone

in: A house divided, Amherst : Humanity Books

Subjective, intersubjective, objective

2001

Donald Davidson

Oxford, Oxford University Press

On the absence of phenomenology

1979

Daniel Dennett

in: Body, mind, and method, Dordrecht : Kluwer

The intentional stance

1987

Daniel Dennett

Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press

Consciousness explained

1991

Daniel Dennett

New York, Little Brown

Caveat emptor

1993

Daniel Dennett

Consciousness and Cognition 2

Tiptoeing past the covered wagons: A response to carr

1994

Daniel Dennett

in: The conceptual self in context, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press

The fantasy of first-person science

2001

Daniel Dennett

Medford, Center for Cognitive Studies Tufts University

Who's on first?: Heterophenomenology explained

2003

Daniel Dennett

Journal of Consciousness Studies Special Issue 10/9-10

Studies in phenomenology and psychology

1966

Aron Gurwitsch

Evanston, Ill., Northwestern University Press

Human encounters in the social world

1979

Aron Gurwitsch

Pittsburgh, Duquesne University Press

Sein und Zeit

1986

Martin Heidegger

Tübingen, Niemeyer

Zur Bestimmung der Philosophie

1999

Martin Heidegger

Frankfurt am Main, Klostermann

Shorter works

1981

Edmund Husserl

Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press

Troubles with heterophenomenology

1994

Eduard Marbach

in: Philosophy and the cognitive sciences, Wien : Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky

Signes

1960

Maurice Merleau-Ponty

Paris, Gallimard

Action in perception

2005

Alva Noë

Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press

Self and schizophrenia: A phenomenological perspective

2003

Josef Parnas

in: The self in neuroscience and psychiatry, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press

Being and nothingness

1956

Jean-Paul Sartre

New York, Philosophical Library

Explaining schizophrenia: The relevance of phenomenology

2007

Louis Sass, Josef Parnas

in: Reconceiving schizophrenia, Oxford : Oxford University Press

The nature of sympathy

1954

Max Scheler

New Haven, Yale University Press

Mental reality

1994

Galen Strawson

Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press

Ten problems of consciousness

1995

Michael Tye

Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press

Self-awareness and alterity: A phenomenological investigation

1999

Dan Zahavi

Evanston, Ill., Northwestern University Press

Husserl's phenomenology

2003

Dan Zahavi

Stanford, Stanford University Press

Back to Brentano?

2004

Dan Zahavi

Journal of Consciousness Studies 11/10-11

Phenomenology

2008

Dan Zahavi

in: Routledge companion to twentieth-century philosophy, London : Routledge

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.