Newsletter of Phenomenology

Keeping phenomenologists informed since May 2002

Repository | Book | Chapter

188616

(1994) Niels Bohr and contemporary philosophy, Dordrecht, Springer.

Niels Bohr's argument for the irreducibility of biology to physics

Paul Hoyningen-Huene

pp. 231-255

Even in his youth, Bohr was familiar with those difficult and controversial questions surrounding the relationship of the phenomena of life to those of inanimate nature, or in other words, the relationship of biology to physics and chemistry. (See e.g., APHK, 96; Folse, 1985, 45–46; and 1990a, 212; Holton, 1970, 142–143, 151; Kay, 1985a, 490; Meyer-Abich, 1965, 180; Petersen, 1985, 307; and Röseberg, 1985, 15–18, 195–196.) Are the phenomena of life in any sense fundamentally different from the processes of inanimate nature, or aren"t they? Bohr became more intensely preoccupied with this question once the stormy development of quantum mechanics had more or less wound down.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-8106-6_10

Full citation:

Hoyningen-Huene, P. (1994)., Niels Bohr's argument for the irreducibility of biology to physics, in J. Faye & H. J. Folse (eds.), Niels Bohr and contemporary philosophy, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 231-255.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.