Newsletter of Phenomenology

Keeping phenomenologists informed since May 2002

Repository | Book | Chapter

190763

(2019) Discussing new materialism, Dordrecht, Springer.

Historical materialism and actor-network-theory

Joost van Loon

pp. 39-65

This chapter argues that despite clear epistemological differences, Historical Materialism and Actor-Network-Theory can be combined to provide a framework for understanding the methodological consequences of "taking matter seriously". By focusing on practices of abstraction and practices of translation respectively, both theoretical traditions have provided critical interventions in the dominant philosophical traditions of their time. Both interventions show how to break away from the pitfalls of idealism, not simply by reversing the assumed direction of causality as Feuerbach did, but by dismantling the dualistic premises that have framed the western metaphysical tradition since Plato. Using the example of signing a document, the chapter shows that without the materiality of mediation, it is impossible to understand the binding nature of legal agreements. What materiality binds is not simply inscriptions of reality, but the very matters of concern or interests that generate and motivate particular associations. Materiality is the actualization of abstraction and translation and thus pivotal to the durability of the iterative workings sociologists call 'society".

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-22300-7_3

Full citation:

van Loon, J. (2019)., Historical materialism and actor-network-theory, in U. Tikvah kissmann (ed.), Discussing new materialism, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 39-65.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.