Newsletter of Phenomenology

Keeping phenomenologists informed since May 2002

Repository | Book | Chapter

192048

(2016) Materialism, Dordrecht, Springer.

Naturalization, localization

a remark on brains and the posterity of the enlightenment

Charles Wolfe

pp. 79-85

From the Enlightenment to philosophy of mind in the mid-twentieth century, two distinct trajectories can be distinguished, both of which are relevant to our story in different ways: the development of experimental neuroscience, and the gradual recognition that materialist philosophy should concern itself with the status of the brain. If classically, materialism as a thesis about the world was distinct from materialism as a brain-mind theory, some historical cases complicate that distinction, such as the debate on Locke on thinking matter. But nevertheless, it is a very operative distinction (also made by eighteenth-century critics). How do we get from that, to the "vulgar materialism" of the nineteenth century (Vogt, Moleschott, but already Cabanis in 1800), with the idea of the brain secreting thought? And how, from that, to brain-mind reflections in the twentieth century? I can only suggest some pathways …

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24820-2_6

Full citation:

Wolfe, C. (2016). Naturalization, localization: a remark on brains and the posterity of the enlightenment, in Materialism, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 79-85.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.