Newsletter of Phenomenology

Keeping phenomenologists informed since May 2002

234264

(2019) Synthese 196 (3).

No microphysical causation? no problem

selective causal skepticism and the structure of completeness-based arguments for physicalism

Matthew C. Haug

pp. 1187-1208

A number of philosophers have argued that causation is not an objective feature of the microphysical world but rather is a perspectival phenomenon that holds only between “coarse-grained” entities such as those that figure in the special sciences. This view seems to pose a problem for arguments for physicalism that rely on the alleged causal completeness of physics. In this paper, I address this problem by arguing that the completeness of physics has two components, only one of which is causal. These two components of completeness can be used in an argument for physicalism that is supported by strong inductive evidence even in the absence of microphysical causation.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/s11229-017-1519-4

Full citation:

Haug, M. C. (2019). No microphysical causation? no problem: selective causal skepticism and the structure of completeness-based arguments for physicalism. Synthese 196 (3), pp. 1187-1208.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.